Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpoZFspI/#3.42.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(0) → 0
half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
lastbit(0) → 0
lastbit(s(0)) → s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) → lastbit(x)
conv(0) → cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) → cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(0) → 0
half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
lastbit(0) → 0
lastbit(s(0)) → s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) → lastbit(x)
conv(0) → cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) → cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

Q is empty.

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [19] we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(0) → 0
half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
lastbit(0) → 0
lastbit(s(0)) → s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) → lastbit(x)
conv(0) → cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) → cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))
lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HALF(s(s(x))) → HALF(x)
CONV(s(x)) → LASTBIT(s(x))
CONV(s(x)) → CONV(half(s(x)))
LASTBIT(s(s(x))) → LASTBIT(x)
CONV(s(x)) → HALF(s(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(0) → 0
half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
lastbit(0) → 0
lastbit(s(0)) → s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) → lastbit(x)
conv(0) → cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) → cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))
lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HALF(s(s(x))) → HALF(x)
CONV(s(x)) → LASTBIT(s(x))
CONV(s(x)) → CONV(half(s(x)))
LASTBIT(s(s(x))) → LASTBIT(x)
CONV(s(x)) → HALF(s(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(0) → 0
half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
lastbit(0) → 0
lastbit(s(0)) → s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) → lastbit(x)
conv(0) → cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) → cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))
lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 3 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LASTBIT(s(s(x))) → LASTBIT(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(0) → 0
half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
lastbit(0) → 0
lastbit(s(0)) → s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) → lastbit(x)
conv(0) → cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) → cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))
lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LASTBIT(s(s(x))) → LASTBIT(x)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))
lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))
lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LASTBIT(s(s(x))) → LASTBIT(x)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

LASTBIT(s(s(x))) → LASTBIT(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HALF(s(s(x))) → HALF(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(0) → 0
half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
lastbit(0) → 0
lastbit(s(0)) → s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) → lastbit(x)
conv(0) → cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) → cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))
lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HALF(s(s(x))) → HALF(x)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))
lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))
lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HALF(s(s(x))) → HALF(x)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

HALF(s(s(x))) → HALF(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONV(s(x)) → CONV(half(s(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(0) → 0
half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
lastbit(0) → 0
lastbit(s(0)) → s(0)
lastbit(s(s(x))) → lastbit(x)
conv(0) → cons(nil, 0)
conv(s(x)) → cons(conv(half(s(x))), lastbit(s(x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))
lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONV(s(x)) → CONV(half(s(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
half(0) → 0

The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))
lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.

lastbit(0)
lastbit(s(0))
lastbit(s(s(x0)))
conv(0)
conv(s(x0))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RuleRemovalProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONV(s(x)) → CONV(half(s(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
half(0) → 0

The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the rule removal processor [15] with the following polynomial ordering [25], at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.

Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:

half(s(0)) → 0

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(CONV(x₁)) = x₁
POL(half(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 2·x₁

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ RuleRemovalProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONV(s(x)) → CONV(half(s(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
half(0) → 0

The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))

half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(CONV(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(half(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONV(s(x)) → CONV(half(s(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(0) → 0

The set Q consists of the following terms:

half(0)
half(s(0))
half(s(s(x0)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.